Jesus pulls back the curtain of history for John to reveal the true origins of the Great Controversy. If we needed any further evidence of who started this war between Good and Evil, look no further than chapter 12. It would not be useful to see chapter 12 chronologically, as John ranges back and forth over the historical timeline to provide more details of this Great Controversy. Lucifer, turned Satan, started this War in Heaven over his jealousy of Jesus and his desire to do his own thing. (See Isaiah 14:12-15; Ezekiel 28:12-15)
Rev. 12:7-9 reveals what Jesus does with Satan the arch-rebel. Here is an excellent summary of this event.
“When Satan sweeps away a “third of the stars,” it is most likely referring to the original war in heaven. In that primordial event, Satan and his followers (one-third of the heavenly host) rebelled against God. In Chapter 12 this battle is viewed from two vantage points. The dragon throws them to the earth, or takes them away from their allegiance to God. In 12:7–9, Satan and his angels are thrown out of heaven to earth by Michael and the heavenly host. Verse 12:4 refers to the initial victory as Satan convinced a third of the heavenly host to join him in the rebellion against God, and 12:7–9 refers to the actual battle, when they are cast out of heaven to the earth.”[1]
This “war in heaven” was not really a physical war, there was no need of that. Polemos, or “war” and “fighting” can mean physical fighting but it can also mean a war of words. When a speaker makes a “polemic” against someone or their idea, he is not physically fighting but is having a “war of words.” The “war in heaven” was a war brought on by Satan’s false ideas and deception of the angels, which resulted in them being expelled or cast out of heaven.
The Spirit of Prophecy suggests a primordial “casting out” of Satan, before the creation of this earth.
“Then there was war in heaven. The Son of God, the Prince of heaven, and His loyal angels engaged in conflict with the arch-rebel and those who united with him. The Son of God and true, loyal angels prevailed; and Satan and his sympathizers were expelled from heaven. All the heavenly host acknowledged and adored the God of justice. Not a taint of rebellion was left in heaven. All was again peaceful and harmonious as before. Angels in heaven mourned the fate of those who had been their companions in happiness and bliss. Their loss was felt in heaven. {SR 19.1}
The Father consulted His Son in regard to at once carrying out their purpose to make man to inhabit the earth. He would place man upon probation to test his loyalty before he could be rendered eternally secure. If he endured the test wherewith God saw fit to prove him, he should eventually be equal with the angels. He was to have the favor of God, and he was to converse with angels, and they with him. He did not see fit to place them beyond the power of disobedience. {SR 19.2}”
The enquiring bible student may then wonder what Jesus meant when he said in John 12:31-33 and Luke 10:18. These texts appear to parallel the one in Rev. 12:10. In John 12:31–33 Jesus is speaking to the Greeks, who had come seeking Him. He mentions what will happen to Satan as a result of His upcoming sacrifice on the Cross. “Now is the judgment of this world: now shall the prince of this world be cast out. And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me. This he said, signifying what death he should die (John 12:31–33).” Luke 10:18 is another instance of this same prophecy. “And he said unto them, I beheld Satan as lightning fall from heaven.”
This appears to be another mention of a “casting out” or limitation for Satan based on this prophecy. The Spirit of Prophecy is again in concordance with Jesus’ statement on this second “casting out” or limitation of Satan in where he can go. Notice these two statements.
“The casting down of Satan as an accuser of the brethren in heaven was accomplished by the great work of Christ in giving up His life. Notwithstanding Satan’s persistent opposition, the plan of redemption was being carried out. Man was esteemed of sufficient value for Christ to sacrifice His life for him. Satan, knowing that the empire he had usurped would in the end be wrested from him, determined to spare no pains to destroy as many as possible of the creatures whom God had created in His image. He hated man because Christ had manifested for him such forgiving love and pity, and he now prepared to practice upon him every species of deception by which he might be lost; he pursued his course with more energy because of his own hopeless condition.” EGW. SDA Bible Comm. Vol. 7, p 973. & The Spirit of Prophecy, vol. 3, pp. 194, 195.
“Satan saw that his disguise was torn away. His administration was laid open before the unfallen angels and before the heavenly universe. He had revealed himself as a murderer. By shedding the blood of the Son of God, he had uprooted himself from the sympathies of the heavenly beings. Henceforth his work was restricted. Whatever attitude he might assume, he could no longer await the angels as they came from the heavenly courts, and before them accuse Christ’s brethren of being clothed with the garments of blackness and the defilement of sin. The last link of sympathy between Satan and the heavenly world was broken.” {DA 761.2}
After Jesus’ assumption of the throne in heaven, Satan was no longer allowed to accuse God’s people directly in the heavenly councils and was certainly no longer the “ruler of this world.” He was now limited to this earth, or cast down to the earth. Before the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross, he could accuse Jesus of showing favoritism to mankind, especially with the translation of Enoch and Elijah to heaven, the raising of Moses, and the raising of Lazarus. With Jesus’ victory on the cross, there was no longer any justification for Satan’s accusations. Satan was defeated. He can no longer accuse God of showing favoritism in saving His people. (From my commentary, pg. 655)
In this Great Controversy struggle on earth, there are two primary earthly antagonists; the woman and the dragon, or the church and Satan. Satan attempts to get at Christ now by using earthly powers to persecute and/or destroy his people. Satan continues the war on earth after being cast out from the war he started in heaven.
A couple of caveats before we begin. Scholarship is not united on the interpretation of this book, particularly in the Christian community. Three major differences must be mentioned.
[1] Grant Osborne, Revelation, 461, for a splendid discussion of this issue. [2] Eugene Boring, Revelation (Louisville, KY: John Knox Press, 1989), 164–167. Special thanks to Ken Mathews, MD
- The first has to do with the story of the pregnant woman and the dragon itself. Some scholars believe John was aware of the mythic tales in the pagan literature and simply made up a “mythic” story himself to portray this struggle. The Isis-Osiris-Horus-Typhon tale from Egypt is a prominent one. In summary, Osiris is killed by Typhon, his evil brother, and the fourteen parts of his body are spread throughout the earth. Isis goes around the earth looking for Osiris, eventually recovers his body parts, and has a child by him. She nurtures her son in the wilderness. Horus, born to Isis, eventually overcomes Typhon and becomes king. It IS NO surprise, to see one story mimicking or copying the other. Which story came first?
- Secondly, we must deal with whether Satan is a real person as mentioned in Scripture or a metaphor for evil. One commentator opines that “early Christianity adopted this mythology (of Satan) as its way of expressing its convictions that evil, while not an eternal counterpart of God, was more than the accumulation of individual human sins. This supra-individual power of evil which has the world and humanity in its grasp” is called by these various names, as mentioned below. “Major theologians of the neo-orthodox era, and many contemporary Christian theologians with a deep social conscience have found the New Testament’s imagery for the demonic power of evil to be valuable when taken seriously but not literally. ‘Satan,’ as a symbolic way of thinking of the super-personal power of evil is a valuable dimension of biblical theology.”[2]
- Is the pregnant woman of Rev. 12 Mary, the mother of Jesus? More than a billion people believe that this pregnant woman in Rev. 12 represents Mary, the mother of Jesus. Is this true? Catholic commentators have created an immense library of literature arguing for the view that the woman of 12:1 symbolizes Mary. If the woman symbolizes Mary, the mother of Jesus, then it severely strains the application of the symbolism in the chapter. The devil goes after Mary, the mother of Jesus, to destroy her, and Mary goes into a (symbolic or literal) wilderness for 1260 days (is it three and a half years or forty-two months of literal time, or prophetic time of 1260 years) and is protected there. Mary does not live on earth today. Mary would be nearly 2,000 years old if she were the literal application of the symbolism. No credibility seems present in this line of reasoning. Extensive bibliographies of the Marian symbolism of the woman of Rev. 12 exist, if you wish to look them up. (from my commentary, pg. 630.)
- The Woman and the Dragon Revelation 12
- The woman and the church in the wilderness
- The dragon
- Dragon at war with the woman at the end (remnant of her seed) because they keep the 10 commandments and have the faith of Jesus
[1] Grant Osborne, Revelation, 461, for a splendid discussion of this issue. [2] Eugene Boring, Revelation (Louisville, KY: John Knox Press, 1989), 164–167. Special thanks to Ken Mathews, MD