Revelation 17: The Harlot, the Scarlet Beast, the Seven Heads, and the Ten Kings

A verse-by-verse prophetic study comparing Scripture, Alberto R. Treiyer, and Ellen G. White

Introduction: The final confrontation between Babylon and the Lamb

Revelation 17 is one of the most important and challenging prophetic chapters in Scripture. It describes the final development of apostate religion, its relationship with the political powers of the earth, its apparent worldwide influence, and its eventual destruction by the very powers that once supported it.

From a traditional Seventh-day Adventist historicist perspective, Revelation 17 must be studied alongside Daniel 2, 7, and 8; Revelation 12, 13, 14, 16, and 18; and the writings of Ellen G. White.

The chapter revolves around six principal prophetic symbols:

1. The great harlot: An apostate religious system that has departed from faithfulness to Christ.

2. The scarlet beast: The political power or powers supporting and carrying apostate religion.

3. The seven heads: Seven mountains and seven kings, representing a succession of powers or phases of rule, depending on the interpretation.

4. The ten horns: Ten kings who ultimately unite their political authority with the beast.

5. Babylon and her daughters: Religious systems sharing Babylon’s characteristic errors and compromises.

6. The Lamb: Jesus Christ, who ultimately overcomes the alliance of earthly powers.

The chapter’s remarkable feature is that Babylon is not finally destroyed by a victorious human religious institution. Instead, the political powers that supported her eventually turn against her, while Christ remains the ultimate victor.

An important distinction between our three sources

The Bible supplies the inspired prophetic text. Ellen White provides an Adventist prophetic interpretation of the church–state conflict, particularly the rise of the image of the beast and Babylon’s eventual downfall. Alberto R. Treiyer offers historical and exegetical arguments for identifying the symbols.

These sources do not provide identical levels of detail. In particular, Ellen White does not supply an explicit verse-by-verse identification of all seven heads in Revelation 17. Adventist interpreters have proposed different sequences, and these should not be presented as settled doctrine.

The following study will distinguish biblical statements, historical identifications, and prophetic inferences.

Part I. Revelation 17:1–7 — The identity and character of Babylon

Verse 1 — The great harlot sitting upon many waters

Biblical text: One of the seven angels announces that John will see the judgment of the great harlot who sits upon many waters.

The opening connects Revelation 17 directly with the seven last plagues of Revelation 16. This is not merely a description of ancient religious apostasy; the vision reveals Babylon’s judgment.

The waters are interpreted explicitly in verse 15 as peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues.

Treiyer’s historical emphasis: The woman represents an apostate religious authority whose influence extends over political territories and populations. The symbol of sitting suggests an established position of influence or dominance.

Ellen White: In The Great Controversy, chapter 21, she identifies Babylon’s central historical manifestation with Rome and describes the extension of Babylon’s influence into Protestant religious bodies.

Prophetic significance: Babylon’s authority is international rather than merely local. Her influence reaches beyond any single nation.

Verse 2 — The kings commit fornication with Babylon

The kings of the earth participate in the woman’s fornication, while the inhabitants of the earth become intoxicated with its wine.

The passage distinguishes two groups: political rulers who cooperate with Babylon and populations influenced by her teachings.

Jeremiah 3 and Ezekiel 16 provide the Old Testament background. Spiritual adultery involves abandoning covenant faithfulness and forming improper alliances.

Treiyer’s emphasis: Religious apostasy becomes especially dangerous when ecclesiastical authority gains political support.

Ellen White: She describes the historical church’s departure from dependence upon Christ and its subsequent reliance upon secular power. Her account of the formation of the image of the beast in The Great Controversy, chapter 25, applies this principle to the final crisis.

Application: The prophetic issue is not ordinary political participation but the use of civil authority to sustain or impose religious objectives.

Verse 3 — The woman riding the scarlet beast

uasvbible.org

John sees a woman sitting upon a scarlet-colored beast, covered with blasphemous names, having seven heads and ten horns.

Four elements deserve attention.

The woman represents apostate religious authority. The beast represents political power. The scarlet color contributes to the imagery of corruption, splendor, and bloodshed. The seven heads and ten horns introduce the historical and final political structures explained later in the chapter.

The woman is not identical to the beast. She rides it.

That distinction is essential. The imagery portrays religious authority supported by political power.

Treiyer’s approach: The relationship is illuminated by the historical alliance of Roman ecclesiastical authority with civil rulers. The woman and beast cooperate but remain distinguishable.

Ellen White: Her description of the image of the beast likewise distinguishes religious organizations from the civil power they seek to employ.

A further point is significant: the woman appears to control the beast, but by verse 16 the beast’s political allies turn against her. The alliance is therefore unstable.

Verse 4 — Purple, scarlet, gold, and the golden cup

The woman is magnificently dressed and holds a golden cup containing abominations and the impurities of her fornication.

Purple and scarlet suggest royal status, splendor, and authority. Gold, precious stones, and pearls emphasize wealth and outward magnificence.

The golden cup is particularly important because its outward beauty conceals corrupting contents.

Compare Jeremiah 51:7, where Babylon is described as a golden cup that intoxicates the nations.

Ellen White: In The Great Controversy, chapter 21, she applies the colors, jewels, and magnificence to the historical pomp of Rome.

The contrast is between external religious beauty and internal spiritual corruption.

A church may possess impressive buildings, ceremonies, resources, and worldwide recognition while failing to remain faithful to the teachings of Christ.

However, the passage does not establish that religious art, beautiful architecture, or ceremonial worship is inherently apostate. The problem is the corruption represented by the cup.

Verse 5 — Babylon the Great, mother of harlots

The name written upon the woman’s forehead is Babylon the Great, the mother of harlots and of the earth’s abominations.

This is among the strongest arguments for understanding Babylon as more than one religious organization.

The word mother implies offspring who reproduce her characteristics.

In traditional Adventist interpretation:

• The mother is associated historically with papal Rome.

• The daughters are religious bodies that perpetuate the mother’s doctrinal errors or coercive church–state principles.

• The family resemblance is spiritual and institutional rather than biological or ethnic.

Ellen White writes in The Great Controversy, chapter 21, that the designation Babylon applies to religious bodies that have departed from biblical truth and perpetuated Rome’s errors.

A crucial distinction is that Babylon is a symbol of systems and their practices, not a declaration that every member of those churches is personally corrupt.

Revelation 18:4 acknowledges God’s people within Babylon.

Verse 6 — Drunk with the blood of the saints

John sees the woman intoxicated with the blood of the saints and martyrs of Jesus.

The prophecy now moves from doctrinal error to religious persecution.

Daniel 7:21 and 25 describe a persecuting power that makes war against the saints and attempts to change times and law.

Treiyer’s historical framework: The persecution of religious dissenters under medieval ecclesiastical and civil arrangements provides an important historical parallel.

Ellen White: In The Great Controversy, chapters 3 and 15, she describes persecution associated with medieval Christendom, including the suffering of dissenting Christians and Protestant reformers.

This imagery warns that religious institutions become profoundly dangerous when they claim authority to punish people for matters of conscience.

Verse 7 — The angel promises an explanation

The angel asks John why he marvels and promises to explain the mystery of the woman and the beast carrying her.

This verse is the transition from symbolic vision to interpretation.

The following verses provide the keys to the beast, the seven heads, the ten horns, and Babylon’s final destruction.

An important exegetical principle follows: the angel’s own explanations should control our interpretation wherever they are explicit.

Part II. Revelation 17:8–11 — The scarlet beast, seven heads, and eighth king

This is the most disputed section of Revelation 17, including among Adventist scholars.

Verse 8 — The beast that was, is not, and will ascend

The angel describes a beast that existed, ceased to exist in some sense, and reappears before going to destruction.

Three movements characterize its career:

The beast ascends from the bottomless pit, or abyssos, and ultimately goes to destruction.

Adventist interpreters commonly compare this pattern with Revelation 13:3, where the sea beast receives a deadly wound that is subsequently healed.

Ellen White identifies the historical papal wound with the events of 1798 and anticipates a restoration of influence before the final conflict.

Nevertheless, Revelation 17:8 does not explicitly say that its scarlet beast is identical in every respect to the sea beast of Revelation 13. That identification must be argued from the relationship between the visions.

Some Adventist scholars understand the scarlet beast more broadly as the recurring political power that supports rebellion against God, while others emphasize its Roman or papal connections.

Verse 9 — The seven heads are seven mountains

The angel explains that the seven heads represent seven mountains on which the woman sits.

Rome was famously associated with seven hills, giving the imagery an immediately recognizable geographical association for ancient readers.

But verse 10 adds that the heads also represent seven kings.

Consequently, the interpretation cannot stop with literal geography.

Mountains can symbolize kingdoms in Old Testament prophecy. Compare Jeremiah 51:25 and Daniel 2:35, 44–45.

The passage therefore contains both geographical and political imagery.

Verse 10 — Five fallen, one present, one still future

The angel states that five kings have fallen, one exists, and a seventh has not yet appeared. When the seventh arrives, he remains a short time.

This verse raises several questions:

Does one is refer to John’s own historical period or to the time represented within the prophetic vision? Do the kings signify individual monarchs, political empires, or successive forms of government? Does the seventh represent a distinct kingdom or the final manifestation of the same anti-God power?

These questions produce different historicist interpretations.

Comparing the principal approaches to the seven heads

Adventist scholar Ranko Stefanović examines the disputed sequences in his article The Seven Heads of the Beast in Revelation 17, published in Ministry in December 2013. His discussion illustrates why interpreters should avoid simplistic claims that the seven heads must correspond to seven modern popes.

Regarding Ellen White: She identifies Rome and the final persecuting religious-political system, but does not give an explicit complete sequence of the seven kings.

Verse 11 — The eighth king belongs to the seven

The beast that was and is not is itself an eighth king, yet belongs to the seven and proceeds to destruction.

This is a particularly unusual expression.

The eighth is both distinct from the seven and connected to them.

One interpretation sees the eighth as the final revival or culmination of an earlier persecuting system. Another sees it as a distinct final manifestation of satanically inspired political authority.

The theological point is clearer than the historical identification: the beast’s apparent restoration is temporary. Its ultimate destiny is destruction.

Revelation does not permit the beast to become the final ruler of history. That role belongs to Christ.

Part III. Revelation 17:12–14 — The ten kings and the final worldwide alliance

Verse 12 — The ten horns receive authority for one hour

The angel identifies the ten horns as ten kings who have not yet received a kingdom but receive authority with the beast for one hour.

In Daniel 7:24, ten horns represent ten kings arising from the fourth kingdom.

Historicist interpreters traditionally connect Daniel’s ten horns with the divisions of the Western Roman Empire.

However, Revelation 17 places special emphasis on a final coalition that receives authority together with the beast.

The phrase one hour indicates a short period, although whether it represents a precise prophetic time interval is debated.

Ellen White’s contribution: She describes the final conflict as involving widespread cooperation among religious and political authorities. She does not identify ten specific modern nations as the ten horns of Revelation 17.

Consequently, claims that the ten horns must be exactly ten contemporary European countries, ten particular presidents, or ten international organizations go beyond what can presently be established from the text.

Verse 13 — The kings surrender their authority to the beast

The ten kings are described as being of one mind and giving their power and authority to the beast.

This is a critical verse for understanding the political dimension of the prophecy.

Their unity is not merely diplomatic. They surrender authority to support a common objective.

From an Adventist perspective, the final alliance is characterized by cooperation in opposition to God’s commandments and the liberty of His people.

Ellen White’s comments on Revelation 17, preserved in The Seventh-day Adventist Bible Commentary, volume 7, page 983, explicitly connect the final conflict with opposition to God’s law and identify the Sabbath as a central issue.

The distinction between Revelation 13 and Revelation 17 is instructive:

Together, these chapters form an important part of the traditional Adventist understanding of the last crisis.

Verse 14 — The kings make war with the Lamb

Revelation 17:14 (NKJV) states:

“These will make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb will overcome them, for He is Lord of lords and King of kings; and those who are with Him are called, chosen, and faithful.”

This is the theological center of the chapter.

The earthly powers appear united and powerful, but their opposition is ultimately directed against Christ.

How do political rulers make war against the Lamb?

Matthew 25:40 and Acts 9:4 establish an important biblical principle: Christ identifies Himself with His people. Persecution of the faithful is therefore an assault against Christ.

The description of God’s people is also important. They are called, chosen, and faithful.

Their victory does not come through superior political organization or military power. It comes through their relationship with the Lamb.

Part IV. Revelation 17:15–18 — The collapse and destruction of Babylon

Verse 15 — The waters represent nations and peoples

The angel explicitly interprets the waters beneath the woman as peoples, multitudes, nations, and tongues.

This confirms that Babylon’s influence extends across national boundaries.

The woman is not merely an isolated congregation or local religious institution. The imagery describes a system of international influence.

The parallel with Revelation 13:7–8 reinforces the worldwide dimensions of the final conflict.

Verse 16 — The ten horns turn against the harlot

This is perhaps the most remarkable development in Revelation 17.

The same political powers that support Babylon eventually turn against her.

The angel says that the horns and beast will hate the harlot, make her desolate, strip her, consume her flesh, and burn her with fire.

The imagery recalls Old Testament judgments against an unfaithful covenant community, especially Ezekiel 16:35–41 and Ezekiel 23:22–29.

The language is symbolic and judicial. It describes the destruction of the apostate system rather than instructing Christians to commit violence against religious opponents.

Why do the political powers turn against Babylon?

Revelation 17 states that they turn against her, but does not explicitly provide every psychological or political reason for their reversal.

Ellen White offers an important explanation in The Great Controversy, pages 655–656.

She describes a time when people recognize that they have been deceived by unfaithful religious leaders. Their former confidence becomes anger, and they turn against those whom they previously trusted.

This provides a striking parallel to Revelation 17:16.

An important qualification is necessary: Ellen White’s description on pages 655–656 is closely associated with the events surrounding Christ’s appearing. Connecting that scene to Revelation 17:16 is a reasonable historicist interpretation, but the two passages should not automatically be treated as a complete, precisely timed sequence.

Verse 17 — God accomplishes His purpose through the kings

The angel explains that God has placed it in the kings’ hearts to fulfill His purpose until His words are accomplished.

This is an extraordinary statement about divine sovereignty.

The political rulers act according to their own purposes, yet their actions ultimately contribute to the fulfillment of God’s judgment.

The principle resembles the biblical account of Cyrus in Isaiah 44:28–45:1 and God’s use of nations in Jeremiah.

It does not mean that God approves of every action committed by those rulers. Rather, He remains sovereign over the final outcome.

Babylon’s apparent political triumph becomes the means of her downfall.

Verse 18 — The woman is the great city ruling over the kings

The angel concludes by identifying the woman with the great city exercising dominion over the kings of the earth.

For John’s first-century audience, Rome would have been the most obvious reference.

Ellen White explicitly identifies Rome as the historical power represented in the imagery of Revelation 17.

In the historicist Adventist interpretation, however, the prophecy reaches beyond imperial Rome to encompass the later religious-political system associated with papal authority and its final influence.

Other Christian interpreters understand the chapter primarily as a denunciation of first-century imperial Rome, while some futurist interpreters expect a future political and religious Babylon.

The Adventist reading is distinctive in treating the prophecy as a historical development culminating in the final crisis.

Part V. How Treiyer and Ellen White fit into the larger interpretation

The most securely documented statements from Ellen White concern Babylon’s identity, its daughters, the improper alliance of church and state, the persecution of God’s people, and the eventual collapse of false religious authority.

Treiyer’s historical approach is relevant to these same questions, but a precise comparison requires care. I was unable to verify his complete Revelation 17 commentary directly in the sources retrieved for this study. The following comparison therefore identifies the broader historicist themes rather than attributing unverified wording or detailed historical sequences to him.

There is also meaningful discussion within Adventist scholarship about whether the scarlet beast represents Satan working through successive political powers. A two-part study in the Journal of Asia Adventist Seminary advances that interpretation and relates the seven heads to historical kingdoms beginning with Egypt. This demonstrates that serious Adventist interpreters do not all identify the beast and heads in precisely the same way.

Part VI. The prophetic message for the church today

Revelation 17 is more than a prediction about Rome, Protestantism, or the world’s political rulers. It raises a fundamental question about the relationship between the church and Jesus Christ.

Does the church depend upon the gospel or upon political power?

Does it seek to persuade the conscience through Scripture and the Holy Spirit, or to compel conformity through civil authority?

Does it defend freedom of conscience for everyone, including those who disagree with its doctrines?

And does its unity arise from fidelity to Christ or from the pursuit of institutional influence?

Ellen White’s explanation in The Great Controversy, chapter 21, makes the issue particularly clear: Babylon’s spiritual decline involves sacrificing truth and divine approval in pursuit of an unlawful alliance with the world.

This warning is not limited to Roman Catholicism or Protestantism. Any Christian institution, including a Seventh-day Adventist institution, should examine its own practices against these biblical principles.

The final contrast

Revelation 17 describes the union of religious apostasy and earthly power. Revelation 19 describes the marriage of the Lamb and His faithful bride.

Babylon’s union is founded upon influence, coercion, and worldly authority. The Lamb’s relationship with His people is founded upon righteousness, faithfulness, and redemption.

The ten kings eventually turn against Babylon, demonstrating the insecurity of every religious system that depends upon worldly power.

The final lesson of Revelation 17 is that political authority cannot save an unfaithful church. Only the Lamb can save His people.